EDGERATING
Methodology

Model Performance

A probability model is judged by calibration over samples, not by single-match hits. Every engine change must move these numbers on out-of-sample matches — or it gets cut.

2026-27 Season · Cumulative (pregame predictions, no hindsight)

Matches scored
72
Model log loss
1.0180
League-prior baseline
1.0714
Edge vs baseline
+0.0534
Brier score
0.6065
Modal picks correct
36/72

Lower log loss = better. Baseline = constant league base rates (home 45%, draw 26%, away 28%). Sample is still tiny (72 matches): treat every number here as noise until at least a half-season has accumulated.

Over 2.5 Calibration

Matches scored
72
Actual Over 2.5 rate
61.1%
Model avg Over 2.5
56.7%
Over 2.5 Brier
0.2287
Over 2.5 log loss
0.6504
Hits (3+ goals)
44/72

Pregame Over 2.5 probability (same number as on each match analysis page) vs whether the final score actually had 3+ goals.

Model said n Model avg Actual Over rate Δ
30–40% 4 36.7% 50.0% (2/4) +13.3 pp
40–50% 12 46.6% 41.7% (5/12) -5.0 pp
50–60% 34 56.5% 58.8% (20/34) +2.4 pp
60–70% 19 65.2% 84.2% (16/19) +19.0 pp
70–80% 3 72.1% 33.3% (1/3) -38.8 pp

Well-calibrated bands sit near Δ ≈ 0 (actual rate ≈ model average). Positive Δ = model under-called Over; negative = over-called.

Per Gameweek

GWMatchesModel log lossBaselineΔPicks
GW 1 9 1.0742 1.1888 +0.1145 4/9
GW 2 9 1.1276 1.0790 -0.0486 2/9
GW 3 9 1.1857 1.2012 +0.0155 4/9
GW 4 9 1.0686 1.1521 +0.0835 4/9
GW 5 9 0.9227 0.8473 -0.0754 6/9
GW 6 9 0.8254 0.9083 +0.0829 7/9
GW 7 9 0.9063 1.1036 +0.1973 5/9
GW 8 9 1.0334 1.0911 +0.0577 4/9