EDGERATING
Methodology

Model Performance

A probability model is judged by calibration over samples, not by single-match hits. Every engine change must move these numbers on out-of-sample matches — or it gets cut.

2026-27 Season · Cumulative (pregame predictions, no hindsight)

Matches scored
80
Model log loss
0.9043
League-prior baseline
1.0511
Edge vs baseline
+0.1468
Brier score
0.5263
Modal picks correct
49/80

Lower log loss = better. Baseline = constant league base rates (home 42%, draw 27%, away 31%). Sample is still tiny (80 matches): treat every number here as noise until at least a half-season has accumulated.

Over 2.5 Calibration

Matches scored
80
Actual Over 2.5 rate
58.8%
Model avg Over 2.5
53.1%
Over 2.5 Brier
0.2449
Over 2.5 log loss
0.6824
Hits (3+ goals)
47/80

Pregame Over 2.5 probability (same number as on each match analysis page) vs whether the final score actually had 3+ goals.

Model said n Model avg Actual Over rate Δ
30–40% 4 39.2% 50.0% (2/4) +10.8 pp
40–50% 24 46.3% 58.3% (14/24) +12.0 pp
50–60% 39 54.4% 59.0% (23/39) +4.6 pp
60–70% 12 64.7% 58.3% (7/12) -6.4 pp
70–80% 1 77.6% 100.0% (1/1) +22.4 pp

Well-calibrated bands sit near Δ ≈ 0 (actual rate ≈ model average). Positive Δ = model under-called Over; negative = over-called.

Per Gameweek

GWMatchesModel log lossBaselineΔPicks
GW 1 10 0.8502 1.0939 +0.2437 6/10
GW 2 10 0.7779 1.0193 +0.2415 8/10
GW 3 10 0.9487 1.0912 +0.1425 6/10
GW 4 10 0.9303 1.0470 +0.1167 5/10
GW 5 10 1.1078 1.0608 -0.0471 4/10
GW 6 10 0.8562 1.0304 +0.1742 7/10
GW 7 10 0.9838 1.0193 +0.0355 5/10
GW 8 10 0.7796 1.0470 +0.2673 8/10