EDGERATING
Methodology

Model Performance

A probability model is judged by calibration over samples, not by single-match hits. Every engine change must move these numbers on out-of-sample matches — or it gets cut.

2026-27 Season · Cumulative (pregame predictions, no hindsight)

Matches scored
99
Model log loss
0.9731
League-prior baseline
1.0749
Edge vs baseline
+0.1017
Brier score
0.5766
Modal picks correct
52/99

Lower log loss = better. Baseline = constant league base rates (home 46%, draw 24%, away 30%). Sample is still tiny (99 matches): treat every number here as noise until at least a half-season has accumulated.

Over 2.5 Calibration

Matches scored
99
Actual Over 2.5 rate
56.6%
Model avg Over 2.5
57.9%
Over 2.5 Brier
0.2243
Over 2.5 log loss
0.6389
Hits (3+ goals)
56/99

Pregame Over 2.5 probability (same number as on each match analysis page) vs whether the final score actually had 3+ goals.

Model said n Model avg Actual Over rate Δ
20–30% 1 29.2% 0.0% (0/1) -29.2 pp
30–40% 5 35.1% 40.0% (2/5) +4.9 pp
40–50% 10 45.8% 40.0% (4/10) -5.8 pp
50–60% 42 55.1% 47.6% (20/42) -7.5 pp
60–70% 31 64.1% 71.0% (22/31) +6.8 pp
70–80% 8 75.0% 75.0% (6/8) +0.0 pp
80–90% 2 84.1% 100.0% (2/2) +15.9 pp

Well-calibrated bands sit near Δ ≈ 0 (actual rate ≈ model average). Positive Δ = model under-called Over; negative = over-called.

Per Gameweek

GWMatchesModel log lossBaselineΔPicks
GW 1 10 0.9003 0.9921 +0.0919 7/10
GW 2 10 1.0675 1.2301 +0.1625 4/10
GW 3 10 0.8733 0.8620 -0.0113 6/10
GW 4 10 1.0775 1.0999 +0.0224 4/10
GW 5 10 1.0400 1.1427 +0.1026 3/10
GW 6 10 0.7955 1.0126 +0.2171 7/10
GW 7 10 1.0175 1.0999 +0.0824 4/10
GW 8 9 0.9466 1.1132 +0.1666 5/9
GW 9 10 0.9690 1.1650 +0.1960 6/10
GW 10 10 1.0411 1.0349 -0.0063 6/10